29 April 2008
The European Commission has decided on a far-reaching reorganisation of the Directorate-General in charge of Fisheries and Maritime Affairs. As from March 29 the former DG PECH became the Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries and will from now on be known as DG MARE.
The main change involves the setting up of three geographic directorates that will be responsible for managing both the Common Fisheries Policy and the new EU integrated maritime policy (IMP) in Europe’s three main maritime regions. In the light of coherent development policies Fair Politics EU welcomes this rebranding, but questions the effective impact for sustainable development.
The ‘new’ DG MARE Commissioner Joe Borg hailed: "The new set up will also boost the implementation of the new EU integrated maritime policy. This will facilitate the use of all the instruments under the Common Fisheries Policy to achieve sustainability in European fisheries."
This new set-up in DG MARE is created to lead to an integrated and tailor-made maritime policy. The Commission says it will be complemented by a new horizontal Directorate which must ensure coordination and policy development. The other two horizontal Directorates (External Policy, and Resources and Legal Affairs) will remain largely unchanged. There will be greater focus on Mediterranean fisheries and on control in international waters in line with the EU's commitment to fight illegal fishing.
The new organisation should reinforce the Commission’s capacity to develop and implement policy for maritime affairs and fisheries alike. It will also allow for the coordinated use of all resources and policy tools in relation to each maritime region: maritime policy, conservation of fish stocks, fisheries control and enforcement, and structural policy.
At an informal Council meeting on the subject of the control of fisheries activities, organized by the Slovenian Presidency of the EU earlier this year, the EU Commissioner for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs, Joe Borg, presented his analysis of the serious shortcomings of the current system. At the same meeting Commissioner Borg stated that the Commission intends to propose a new policy framework at the beginning of October 2008 which will take a global and integrated approach to control, from the fisherman to the consumer. It will focus not only on the catches and the landings, but will look at auctions, markets and imports.
Fair Politics EU stresses that overexploitation of fish stocks still occurs, as reliable and independent scientific data to determine a sustainable maximum catch are often lacking. Local fishermen do not have priority access to fishing grounds: they will continue suffering competition of subsidized European vessels. Most importantly, the local processing industry, which has the highest potential added value in the production chain, receives little support.
The European Union, with the third largest fishing fleet in the world, has a responsibility to take. Due to overexploitation of fish stocks, the livelihood of current and future generations of local fishermen are jeopardized. And the highest added value – which lies in the processing industry – still accrues to European countries, thereby depriving ACP countries of vital development opportunities.
Fair Politics EU supports Commissioner Borg’s up to date analysis of the serious shortcomings of the current system, and hopes the reorganization of the Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries will be a first step in a process leading to better policy coherence for development in the EU fisheries policy.
More information?
Visit the website of the European Commission
Click here to read our article on ‘Developing a culture of compliance is key to sustainable fisheries'
| Greens/EFA | |
| S&D | |
| EPP |
03-09-2009 EP Development Committee concerned about FPA with the Republic of Guinea »
29-04-2008 Rebranding of DG PECH into DG MARE: step up to a more coherent policy? »
Wall Street Journal 23 July 2007
Commission Communication FPA's 2002
ADE evaluation Fisheries Agreements
MRAG comparative study FPAs
Bartels and De la Fayette PCD fisheries study
ICTSD Fisheries Access Agreements
European Consensus on Development 2006
UNDP Human Development Report 2001
News archive FPAs case 2005-2006